Home / Hire engineers / Claude architect
A Claude architect designs your Claude system before developers build it
Claude runs on Anthropic’s own API or inside AWS, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure, as a single call or as agents with tools that reach as much of your company as you allow. A Claude architect settles those choices first, on real sample tasks: where it runs, how the agent is shaped, which tools it reaches through MCP and what each task costs. That is the role we staff.
When to hire a Claude architect, and what gets decided first.
A Claude architect is usually brought in when a question about Claude has no owner yet. Each situation ends as a decision written into your repository, with the work behind it.
Claude, or the model you use now
One team wants to switch, another wants both, and the evidence so far is a few good chats.
The work
- A written case for or against switching
- Both models scored on your tasks
- Tasks where Claude is not the answer
Claude inside your cloud contract
Your data and committed spend sit with AWS, Google Cloud or Azure, and procurement asks whether Claude runs there.
The work
- Anthropic API, Bedrock, Vertex AI or Foundry
- Needed features checked on each platform
- A processing region for your data
An agent, but built which way
A plain tool loop, the Claude Agent SDK and Claude Managed Agents put different work on your servers.
The work
- Who hosts the loop and the sandbox
- Where session state and files are kept
- One agent, or several with narrow jobs
Many agents, one set of company systems
Several teams plan agents on the same CRM, file store and ticket queue, each with its own connector.
The work
- Shared MCP servers, not team connectors
- A register of which agent calls what
- Servers owned by each system’s team
A budget before the build
Finance wants a monthly figure before approving the project, and nobody has priced a single task yet.
The work
- Tokens per task measured on samples
- Cache and batch pricing counted in
- Spend limits set per workspace
A security review on the calendar
The agent will read email, web pages or uploads, and security asks what stops a planted instruction.
The work
- Untrusted text kept from write tools
- Code run only in a sandbox
- Tool results treated as data, not orders
Five decisions, in the order they constrain each other.
The design of one Claude system, taken as five decisions. Each narrows the next, so they are made in this order and written down before a build is planned. A Claude architect is hired because nobody on the team owns them yet.
- 01
Task and limits
What the system must do, what it must never do, and what one wrong result costs the business, agreed with the people who own that risk.
Design brief, risk list - 02
Model and platform
Claude and your current model scored on the same sample tasks, then Anthropic’s API, Bedrock, Vertex AI or Foundry chosen on region, contract and features.
Scored tasks, Claude API, Bedrock - 03
Agent shape
A single model call, your own loop over tools, the Agent SDK or Managed Agents, and how many agents the work actually needs. Every extra agent has to justify its tokens.
Agent SDK, Managed Agents - 04
Tools and scopes
Each system the agent touches is reached through an MCP server, and the tools and scopes every agent receives are listed and traced to a role in your company.
MCP servers, scope register - 05
Cost and rollout
Tokens per task priced with caching and batch discounts, spend limits set per workspace, and the first group of users named before anyone writes production code.
Cost model, spend limits
The choices under every Claude agent.
These choices sit under every agent the company builds on Claude: which model takes which request, how prompts are cached, where documents are searched, where code runs, how spend is capped and how a task is traced.
Model routing
Small, fast models take triage and extraction; larger ones take the requests where scored tasks show they earn their price.
- Claude Haiku
- Claude Sonnet
- Claude Opus
Context and caching
Tool definitions and instructions laid out so the stable part is cached, and each request pays full price only for what changed.
- Prompt caching
- Token counting API
Retrieval beyond context
Search over documents too large to send whole, with each chunk given enough surrounding context to be found by the question that needs it.
- pgvector
- Voyage AI
- OpenSearch
Sandboxed code
Code an agent writes runs only in an isolated container, with no network by default and no credentials it was not given.
- Code execution tool
- Docker
Workspaces and limits
A workspace per product team, so each team’s usage, rate limits and spend cap are counted and capped apart.
- Claude Console
- Admin API
Tracing across agents
One trace follows a task through every agent, model call and MCP server it touches, so a failure is placed at the right boundary.
- OpenTelemetry
- Langfuse
Engagement depth, and what each level owns
A senior architect is handed one system and a blank page. A lead inherits several teams’ designs and keeps them consistent with each other.
- Senior · One system, design phase
- Designs one Claude system from a blank page: the platform, the agent’s shape, the MCP servers and the scopes each tool gets, the scored sample tasks and the cost model. Stays into the first build sprints to answer the developers’ questions and settle what the design did not foresee.
- Lead · Several teams, one register
- Inherits several teams’ Claude designs and keeps them from drifting apart: one register of MCP servers, workspaces and spend limits, and one way of granting tool access. Decides when a team’s design departs far enough to need a review, and reports cost and risk across them to your CTO.
AI-assisted design work, with a senior architect answering for every decision.
Coding agents make it cheap to try an idea in working code, so a Claude design can be settled on runs instead of diagrams. The choices that are expensive to reverse stay with the architect: the platform, what each agent may touch, where untrusted text can reach, and what a task may cost.
Example · MCP scopes per server
- Added helpdesk.search_tickets · readown queue only
- Added kb.get_article · readpublic articles
- Changed Tool results capped per callcontext budget
- Removed run_sql tool from prototypetoo broad
- Added billing.get_invoice · readHuman decision
Read-only tools; billing data needs its team
Two designs run, not argued
Agents build rough versions of competing options, such as a plain tool loop against the Agent SDK, so the choice rests on a run over your real tasks.
Platform gaps found by running
Each prototype runs on the platform the design names, so a feature missing on Bedrock or Vertex AI shows up in a failed run, not after launch.
Drift from the design flagged
Once developers start, an agent compares the tool scopes in the code with the design record and flags each difference for the architect to settle.
From your requirements to matching developers in 3 working days.
You do not need to enter a long recruitment process before you know whether we have the right people.
Senior Claude architect
9 years · ImproveIT engineer
- Agent design
- MCP scopes
- Claude Agent SDK
- Amazon Bedrock
- Cost per task
- English
- C1
- Overlap with CET
- Full working day
- Available
- In two weeks
- Rate
- In the proposal
Recent projectModel provider move for a lease-data platform
Tell us what you need
Send the role, stack, seniority, required experience, working-hour overlap, team size, and expected start date.
Get matching profiles
Within three working days, we send relevant profiles with CVs, project experience, English level, availability, and rates.
Interview the developers yourself
Use your own technical interview and selection process. Meet the people who would actually join the team and reject anyone you are not confident about.
Start working together
Once you choose, we handle the contract and onboarding. Your developers join your repositories, standups, tooling, and delivery process.
Choose the engagement model that fits the gap.
You can hire software developers through an outsourcing model that matches how much ownership, capacity, and flexibility your team needs. Most clients start with one engineer and grow. Roles and stacks are further down the page.
Ad-hoc staff augmentation
One engineer or several, embedded in your team and managed by you. The most common way clients start with us.
Best for a named capability or capacity gap you already understand.
- Speed
- Profiles in 3 days
- Pricing
- Per hour
- Managed by
- You
Dedicated team
A complete team for a product, a module or a roadmap stream — engineering, QA, DevOps and design as the work needs it.
Best for stable delivery capacity without hiring every role in-house.
- Speed
- 2–4 weeks to assemble
- Pricing
- Monthly per person
- Managed by
- You, or jointly with our lead
Recruitment
We recruit for a skill set we do not have on the bench, against your requirements, and the person joins on your contract.
Best for a niche stack, a rare seniority level, or a role you keep failing to fill locally.
- Speed
- 2–4 weeks
- Pricing
- Per hire
- Managed by
- You
Build, operate, transfer
We hire and run the team in Poland or Ukraine, then hand it over to you as your own staff for direct contracts when you are ready.
Best for opening a development centre in Europe without setting one up yourself first.
- Speed
- 3-4 weeks to build
- Pricing
- Monthly per person, plus a transfer fee
- Managed by
- Us, then you
The reason to outstaff is speed. The reason to stay is quality.
Netguru, a 500-person Polish consultancy whose own clients include UBS, has staffed projects with our engineers for more than 8 years. They could hire anyone.
Staff augmentationNetguru, 2018-ongoing
Read the Netguru case studyNetguru has staffed projects with our engineers
at Netguru, whose own clients include UBS
From your requirements to matching profiles with CVs
Of our developers have 5 to 20 years of experience
Our longest continuous engagement, still running
Time zones, with working hours flexed to match your team
What it is like to have our engineers on your team.
“I have worked with ImproveIT for more than 3 years, as a mobile product manager for Photoweb and now as a director of Piiics. In both, the technical challenge is quite high. The dev team has been highly motivated and professional.”
Clement PoursacPhotoweb Group · France
“We work with ImproveIT Solutions for years. Thanks to their support with new talents/developers we were able to proceed with many new projects. For sure we value their employees, we are happy to have them with us and we always do our best to keep them as long as we can in our projects.”
Barbara KucharczykNetguru · Poland
“Their attention to detail is great, and they question us if they think it might be better to solve the issue in a different way. They really care about the product they're building.”
Michael KolomenkinEyeToAi · Israel
“Their ability to advise and provide professional guidance made them a go-to partner. The engineering team demonstrated outstanding dedication and technical skills.”
Yannick BlondeauHotel-Spider · Switzerland
“They understand the needs and manage the project seamlessly. They stand out for their professionalism, skills, and the quality of the candidates they provide.”
Andrew NolanAnitech Solutions · Ireland
“Great app that works with functionality exactly like we want it. Internal stakeholders are particularly impressed with the quality of deliverables. They take ownership beyond their contractual obligations.”
Alok AlstromBeyond Liberum AB · Sweden
“Within one year we reached a 99% crash-free user ratio on both operating systems, which was one of our goals. Within two years we reworked all our apps and improved our conversion rate by 50%.”
Axel BouthorsPiiics · France
“All tasks are done on their side, they've always delivered on time, and their code quality is good. The developer assigned to us is always available.”
Luka SikicOnpreo GmbH · Germany
“We were very impressed with the wide range of experts. We've been able to significantly speed up the development of a number of our projects on a very reasonable budget.”
Martin Enderleintencio s.r.o · Czech Republic
“Exceptional service delivery: in-time, on-budget, with high quality and professional advice.”
Marcus ZedlerCamyylyon · Switzerland
“With a limited budget, we have been able to master 3 new tools: Rich Snippet, Rating-Widget, Survey. A good outcome that helped me and my lead frontend developer.”
Carsten SchaeferTrust · Germany
“Developers are experienced. They can discover the main potential issues and are able to solve them beforehand.”
Romain CoiraultLalalab · France
“A highly adaptive team that offers helpful insights and delivers work at reasonable rates.”
Didier GromaireCedemo · Monaco
Questions about hiring a Claude architect.
How is a Claude architect different from a Claude developer?
The architect decides; the developer builds. An architect settles where Claude runs, what shape the agent takes, which tools it may reach and what a task costs, and writes each decision down. A developer turns that design into working code and ships it. On a small project one senior person can do both; on a larger one, the design is reviewed before the build starts.
Should we call Anthropic’s API directly, or use Claude through our cloud?
It depends on the region your data must stay in, which cloud contract you already pay into, and which features the design needs, because not every Claude feature reaches every platform at the same time. Each feature the design relies on is checked on each candidate platform before one is chosen.
What if Claude is the wrong choice for us?
Then the design says so. The model and platform decision exists to find out early: where your current model already does the job, or a task depends on a feature Claude does not offer on your cloud, the recommendation is to stay. A Claude architect is paid for the decision, not for a migration.
What will the agent cost to run each month?
The architect prices one task first: tokens in and out, the share of the prompt read from cache, and which work can wait for batch pricing. That figure times your expected volume becomes the monthly estimate, and spend limits on each workspace stop the bill running past it.
Do we need one agent or several?
Usually one to begin with. A second agent earns its place when a job would overflow the first one’s context or needs different permissions, and then each gets a narrow task and only its own tools. Every extra agent adds tokens and another place to fail, so the design has to say why it is there.
What stops an instruction hidden in an email from steering the agent?
The shape of the design, more than the prompt. Text from email, web pages and uploads is handled as data, an agent reading it gets no tool that changes records in the same run, and code runs only in a sandbox. The design lists each place outside text enters and what it can reach from there.
Do your Claude architects hold Anthropic’s certification?
We do not claim it on this page. Anthropic’s Claude Certified Architect exams, at Foundations and Professional level, test choosing deployment platforms, shaping agent architectures, and planning for evaluation, cost and safety. Our checks cover that ground: each candidate walks us through a Claude system they designed and a trade-off they would now make differently. Ask about certification in the interview.
What do we keep from the design work?
The design records, the MCP server and scope register, the scored sample tasks and the cost model, committed to your repository as each decision is made. A developer, ours or yours, can build from them without the architect in the room, and the next model release can be scored against the same tasks.
Can we start with one senior developer?
Yes. Many clients start with one senior engineer to cover a specific capability or capacity gap, then add specialists only when the roadmap requires them.
Can we scale the team up or down?
Yes. Adding an engineer follows the same route as the first, and you interview them. Reducing the team follows the notice period agreed in the contract, and the work is handed over in your repository before anyone leaves.
Will the developer work as part of our team?
Yes. You manage priorities and day-to-day work directly, in your own channels and delivery process.
Do we interview the developer before they start?
Yes. You interview every candidate using your own process and make the final decision about who joins the team.
Are the developers your employees or freelancers?
Our engineers are ImproveIT employees and long-term contractors working through our teams in Poland and Ukraine. We are not a freelance marketplace and do not resell developers from other vendors.
What if the developer is not the right fit?
Replacement terms are defined in the contract upfront, so it does not become a negotiation.
Who owns the code and intellectual property?
You do. IP assignment is included in the contract, and we can sign an NDA before discussing the project.
How do you handle security, access and NDAs?
We sign an NDA before discussing the project, and confidentiality and IP assignment are part of the contract. Engineers work in your repositories, cloud accounts and tools with the access your team grants, so you can narrow or revoke it at any time.
Can your developers work with our timezone?
Yes. Our engineers work with teams across Europe and the US. We agree the required working-hour overlap before matching candidates.
How is their English?
Our developers work in English with international product and engineering teams every day. English level is included in the candidate information you receive before the interview.
What does it cost to hire a developer?
Rates depend on the role, seniority, experience, and engagement model. You receive the rate, availability, and candidate profile in writing before making any commitment.
What are the minimum engagement and notice period?
Both are agreed before the engagement starts and included in the proposal and contract. We are flexible in that and usually agree on the terms suitable for a client.
Ready to build what the design describes?
A developer who builds it on Claude, a team that delivers the agents as a project, or an engineer for when the answer is another model.
Tell us which engineers you need.
Stack, seniority, how many and when. We come back with matching profiles, availability and rates within three working days.
You interview them with your own process, and you reject anyone you are not sure about.
- 1Send the requirements
- 2Get profiles with CVs, availability and rates in 3 days
- 3Interview, choose, and start within a week
We sign an NDA before discussing anything in detail. We reply within 24 hours.
CP
BK
MK
YB
AN
AA
AB
LS
ME
MZ
CS
RC
DG