Skip to content

Home / Hire engineers / MLOps engineer

An MLOps engineer gets trained models into production and keeps them working

The notebook proved the model. An MLOps engineer gets it packaged, served fast enough for the product, retrained as the data changes and watched for the day its predictions slip, so every version answering users can be traced and rolled back. The engineer joins the team that trained the model, not a separate operations queue. That is the role we staff.


Profiles in three daysYou interview and chooseClaude Code Partner

Signs a model needs someone to run it, and the first fixes.

A trained model is not yet a working one. The trouble shows weeks after the notebook said the model was good, usually as one of these six, each with the work done first.

  1. A model that runs in one notebook

    It works on a data scientist’s laptop, and nobody else can rebuild it or call it from the product.

    The work

    • Training rerunnable from code and data
    • The model packaged with its dependencies
    • An endpoint the product can call
  2. Retraining depends on one person

    Someone pulls fresh data, reruns a notebook and swaps the model file, and nobody checks the new one wins.

    The work

    • Retraining written as a pipeline
    • Each data snapshot kept with its model
    • Promoted only if it beats production
  3. Predictions got worse without warning

    Customers, suppliers or input formats changed, and the model kept answering with confidence while it was wrong.

    The work

    • Outcomes joined back to past predictions
    • Seasonal swings told apart from decay
    • Alerts on drift, not only on errors
  4. Nobody knows which model is live

    Model files sit in storage under hopeful names, and no one can say which version answers users.

    The work

    • A registry entry for every version
    • Lineage from data snapshot to endpoint
    • Every prediction logged with its version
  5. Training and live inputs disagree

    The same field is computed one way in training and another in production, so tests pass and predictions miss.

    The work

    • Skew checks between training and live data
    • One feature definition for both paths
    • Inputs logged at prediction time
  6. GPUs paid for while idle

    Inference servers run around the clock for traffic that peaks twice a day, and training jobs hold GPUs between runs.

    The work

    • Cost per thousand predictions measured
    • Batch scoring for non-urgent predictions
    • Training GPUs released when jobs end

The life of a model version.

Five stages every model version passes through after training. An MLOps engineer is hired because one of them is done by hand, done by whoever trained the model, or not done at all.

  1. 01

    Register

    Passed

    Each version stored with its data snapshot, code commit and evaluation scores, so any model answering users can be traced and rebuilt.

    MLflow, DVC
  2. 02

    Package

    Passed

    The model, its preprocessing and its exact library versions built into one image, and checked to give the same predictions as the training run.

    BentoML, ONNX Runtime
  3. 03

    Shadow and canary

    Blocked

    The new version scores copies of live requests before it answers anyone, then serves a small share of traffic with rollback set to fire automatically.

    KServe, Istio
  4. 04

    Monitor

    Waiting

    Input drift, live error once outcomes arrive, latency and cost per prediction, on one dashboard per model with a named owner for each alert.

    Evidently, NannyML
  5. 05

    Retrain

    Waiting

    A schedule or a drift threshold starts the next training run from a fresh data snapshot, and the result goes back to the registry as a candidate.

    Kubeflow Pipelines, Airflow

The platform under every model.

The stages above repeat for every model. These are the shared pieces underneath, set up once so the next model does not start from zero, and paid for in GPU hours.

Managed ML platforms

Training jobs, endpoints and model storage on the ML service of the cloud you already use, with access scoped per project.

  • Amazon SageMaker
  • Vertex AI
  • Azure ML

Feature store

Features defined once and read by training jobs in bulk and by live requests in milliseconds, from the same definitions.

  • Feast

GPU scheduling

Training jobs queued for GPUs against each team’s quota, and machines released the moment a job ends instead of at the end of the month.

  • Kueue
  • SkyPilot

Inference servers

Servers that batch requests and fit several models on one GPU, chosen for the product’s latency target rather than by habit.

  • NVIDIA Triton
  • Ray Serve

Language model serving

Open language models served on your own GPUs where volume or data rules justify it, with batching and memory tuned per model.

  • vLLM
  • SGLang

Model regression tests

A fixed sample of real requests with known answers, rerun against each candidate and each library upgrade, so a rebuilt model must score the same.

  • pytest
  • Great Expectations

Seniority, from one model to a shared platform

Levels differ in how many models, and how many teams, depend on decisions the engineer makes alone.

Mid · 3–5 years
Keeps existing models healthy: reruns failed training jobs, onboards new models from the pipeline template and promotes versions a senior engineer approved. Works from a runbook when a drift alert fires. Changes to rollout rules and serving capacity go to a senior engineer for review.
Senior · 5–8 years
Designs the registry, the retraining pipelines and the drift checks for a product’s models, and can take over models a previous team left behind. Approves every change to serving, decides when a candidate replaces the live model, and answers for latency and cost per prediction.
Lead · 8+ years
Chooses between a managed ML service and an open-source stack across teams, and decides how GPU time is split between training and serving when teams compete for it. Sets the checks every team’s models must pass before production, from regression tests to automatic rollback.

AI-assisted MLOps, with a senior engineer answering for every rollout.

Coding agents draft the repetitive half of model operations: pipeline steps, serving specs, drift checks and the package updates every model needs when a library moves. The half where a mistake means wrong predictions served at scale stays with the engineer: which version goes live, how much traffic it takes and what may trigger retraining.

Rollout · retrained ticket routerDrafted with an agent

Example · rollout plan

  • Added Canary on a small share of ticketsnew model answers
  • Added Auto-rollback if reroutes climbvs live model
  • Changed Live inputs checked for skewvs training data
  • Removed Manual copy to model servernow a step
  • Changed Traffic: canary to all ticketsHuman decision

Shadow scores matched; full traffic waits

Senior MLOps engineerCompared shadow scores with the live modelCanary only
Start the canary

Pipelines for every model, not only one

Agents rewrite notebook and cron-job training as pipeline steps for each model on the platform. A rewrite counts only when it rebuilds a past model from the same snapshot with matching scores.

Every generated change is checked against real predictions

When a framework or base image changes, an agent prepares the update for every model, and the engineer compares each rebuilt model’s predictions on a fixed sample before it ships.

Promotion, traffic and retraining triggers stay human

Which version answers users, how much traffic a canary takes and which drift signals may start retraining are the engineer’s decisions. An agent may draft a rollout plan; it never approves one.

From your requirements to matching developers in 3 working days.

You do not need to enter a long recruitment process before you know whether we have the right people.

Senior MLOps engineer

9 years · ImproveIT engineer

  • MLflow
  • Kubeflow
  • Amazon SageMaker
  • Model serving
English
C1
Overlap with CET
Full working day
Available
In two weeks
Rate
In the proposal

Recent projectMoved a live AI pipeline from OpenAI to Gemini

Example profile · day 3Book your interview
01

Tell us what you need

Send the role, stack, seniority, required experience, working-hour overlap, team size, and expected start date.

02

Get matching profiles

Within three working days, we send relevant profiles with CVs, project experience, English level, availability, and rates.

03

Interview the developers yourself

Use your own technical interview and selection process. Meet the people who would actually join the team and reject anyone you are not confident about.

04

Start working together

Once you choose, we handle the contract and onboarding. Your developers join your repositories, standups, tooling, and delivery process.

Choose the engagement model that fits the gap.

You can hire software developers through an outsourcing model that matches how much ownership, capacity, and flexibility your team needs. Most clients start with one engineer and grow. Roles and stacks are further down the page.


01

Ad-hoc staff augmentation

One engineer or several, embedded in your team and managed by you. The most common way clients start with us.

Best for a named capability or capacity gap you already understand.

Speed
Profiles in 3 days
Pricing
Per hour
Managed by
You
02

Dedicated team

A complete team for a product, a module or a roadmap stream — engineering, QA, DevOps and design as the work needs it.

Best for stable delivery capacity without hiring every role in-house.

Speed
2–4 weeks to assemble
Pricing
Monthly per person
Managed by
You, or jointly with our lead
03

Recruitment

We recruit for a skill set we do not have on the bench, against your requirements, and the person joins on your contract.

Best for a niche stack, a rare seniority level, or a role you keep failing to fill locally.

Speed
2–4 weeks
Pricing
Per hire
Managed by
You
04

Build, operate, transfer

We hire and run the team in Poland or Ukraine, then hand it over to you as your own staff for direct contracts when you are ready.

Best for opening a development centre in Europe without setting one up yourself first.

Speed
3-4 weeks to build
Pricing
Monthly per person, plus a transfer fee
Managed by
Us, then you

The reason to outstaff is speed. The reason to stay is quality.

Netguru, a 500-person Polish consultancy whose own clients include UBS, has staffed projects with our engineers for more than 8 years. They could hire anyone.

Staff augmentationNetguru, 2018-ongoing

Read the Netguru case study
8+years

Netguru has staffed projects with our engineers

500+people

at Netguru, whose own clients include UBS

Where our engineers ran models inside a live product.

Neither was an MLOps hire on its own. In both, our engineers answered for the models inside a product, alongside the product itself.

AI and data platformElysium

An AI document pipeline moved from OpenAI to Google Gemini mid-roadmap

2 team membersTeam
2025 - 2026Period

Elysium turns leases and property documents into one searchable knowledge layer. Our engineers took over mid-roadmap without disrupting delivery, then owned the AI pipeline and CI/CD, including its move from OpenAI to Google Gemini.

Read the Elysium case study
3days

From your requirements to matching profiles with CVs

90%

Of our developers have 5 to 20 years of experience

6years

Our longest continuous engagement, still running

10+

Time zones, with working hours flexed to match your team

What it is like to have our engineers on your team.

“I have worked with ImproveIT for more than 3 years, as a mobile product manager for Photoweb and now as a director of Piiics. In both, the technical challenge is quite high. The dev team has been highly motivated and professional.”

Clement PoursacPhotoweb Group · France

“We work with ImproveIT Solutions for years. Thanks to their support with new talents/developers we were able to proceed with many new projects. For sure we value their employees, we are happy to have them with us and we always do our best to keep them as long as we can in our projects.”

Barbara KucharczykNetguru · Poland

“Their attention to detail is great, and they question us if they think it might be better to solve the issue in a different way. They really care about the product they're building.”

Michael KolomenkinEyeToAi · Israel

“Their ability to advise and provide professional guidance made them a go-to partner. The engineering team demonstrated outstanding dedication and technical skills.”

Yannick BlondeauHotel-Spider · Switzerland

“They understand the needs and manage the project seamlessly. They stand out for their professionalism, skills, and the quality of the candidates they provide.”

Andrew NolanAnitech Solutions · Ireland

“Great app that works with functionality exactly like we want it. Internal stakeholders are particularly impressed with the quality of deliverables. They take ownership beyond their contractual obligations.”

Alok AlstromBeyond Liberum AB · Sweden

“Within one year we reached a 99% crash-free user ratio on both operating systems, which was one of our goals. Within two years we reworked all our apps and improved our conversion rate by 50%.”

Axel BouthorsPiiics · France

“All tasks are done on their side, they've always delivered on time, and their code quality is good. The developer assigned to us is always available.”

Luka SikicOnpreo GmbH · Germany

“We were very impressed with the wide range of experts. We've been able to significantly speed up the development of a number of our projects on a very reasonable budget.”

Martin Enderleintencio s.r.o · Czech Republic

“Exceptional service delivery: in-time, on-budget, with high quality and professional advice.”

Marcus ZedlerCamyylyon · Switzerland

“With a limited budget, we have been able to master 3 new tools: Rich Snippet, Rating-Widget, Survey. A good outcome that helped me and my lead frontend developer.”

Carsten SchaeferTrust · Germany

“Developers are experienced. They can discover the main potential issues and are able to solve them beforehand.”

Romain CoiraultLalalab · France

“A highly adaptive team that offers helpful insights and delivers work at reasonable rates.”

Didier GromaireCedemo · Monaco

Questions about hiring an MLOps engineer.

What does an MLOps engineer do that a DevOps engineer does not?

The parts peculiar to models. Code fails loudly; a model keeps answering while its predictions get worse, because live data has moved away from what it learned on. The MLOps engineer versions training data, automates retraining, runs the registry and watches prediction quality. Servers, clusters and the delivery pipeline usually stay with a DevOps engineer, and the two work side by side.

Do we need an MLOps engineer for one or two models?

Not always. One model retrained a few times a year can live in a well-written pipeline that your ML or DevOps engineer runs. An MLOps engineer pays off when models retrain often, several share a platform, or a wrong prediction costs money before anyone notices it. We say which case you are in before any profiles go out.

Do we have to use SageMaker, Vertex AI or Azure ML?

No. A managed platform saves effort when your team already works in that cloud. Open-source tools such as MLflow and Kubeflow suit teams that already run their own clusters or need the same set-up on more than one cloud. The recommendation comes after the engineer has seen your models, your request volumes and the people who will maintain it.

How often should a model be retrained?

It depends on how fast the world behind the data moves. A model scoring transactions can go stale in weeks, while one sorting documents may hold for a year. The engineer starts with a cautious schedule, then stretches or shortens it as monitoring shows how quickly quality decays, and adds a drift threshold that can start a run early.

Can the engineer take over models another team built?

Yes. The engineer first tries to rebuild each model from its recorded data and code, and compares the predictions with what is live. A model that cannot be reproduced is documented as it is and left serving until it has been rebuilt properly, never retrained blind. You get a written list of which models can be reproduced and which cannot.

How do you keep inference costs under control?

By matching hardware to traffic. The engineer measures cost per thousand predictions, moves scoring that does not need real time to batch jobs, tests smaller or compressed model formats against the accuracy the product needs, and lets GPUs scale down between peaks. Each saving is checked on the evaluation set, because a cheaper model that answers worse is not a saving.

Who decides when a new model version goes live?

Your team sets the rule; the engineer enforces it. Before the first rollout, the team whose product uses the predictions agrees what a candidate must beat and how long it runs as a canary. The MLOps engineer automates that check and holds anything that fails it. Overriding the rule is a person’s decision, and it is written down.

Can the engineer serve open language models on our own GPUs?

Yes, when hosting them yourself makes sense. The engineer sets up an inference server, sizes GPU memory and batching for your traffic and puts the same registry, canary and monitoring around it as any other model. Before you buy or rent GPUs, both options are costed per request on your real traffic, because at low volume a hosted API often costs less.

Can we start with one senior developer?

Yes. Many clients start with one senior engineer to cover a specific capability or capacity gap, then add specialists only when the roadmap requires them.

Can we scale the team up or down?

Yes. Adding an engineer follows the same route as the first, and you interview them. Reducing the team follows the notice period agreed in the contract, and the work is handed over in your repository before anyone leaves.

Will the developer work as part of our team?

Yes. You manage priorities and day-to-day work directly, in your own channels and delivery process.

Do we interview the developer before they start?

Yes. You interview every candidate using your own process and make the final decision about who joins the team.

Are the developers your employees or freelancers?

Our engineers are ImproveIT employees and long-term contractors working through our teams in Poland and Ukraine. We are not a freelance marketplace and do not resell developers from other vendors.

What if the developer is not the right fit?

Replacement terms are defined in the contract upfront, so it does not become a negotiation.

Who owns the code and intellectual property?

You do. IP assignment is included in the contract, and we can sign an NDA before discussing the project.

How do you handle security, access and NDAs?

We sign an NDA before discussing the project, and confidentiality and IP assignment are part of the contract. Engineers work in your repositories, cloud accounts and tools with the access your team grants, so you can narrow or revoke it at any time.

Can your developers work with our timezone?

Yes. Our engineers work with teams across Europe and the US. We agree the required working-hour overlap before matching candidates.

How is their English?

Our developers work in English with international product and engineering teams every day. English level is included in the candidate information you receive before the interview.

What does it cost to hire a developer?

Rates depend on the role, seniority, experience, and engagement model. You receive the rate, availability, and candidate profile in writing before making any commitment.

What are the minimum engagement and notice period?

Both are agreed before the engagement starts and included in the proposal and contract. We are flexible in that and usually agree on the terms suitable for a client.

What sits either side of the models?

The engineer who trains the next model, the cluster and delivery pipeline underneath, or the data platform the models learn from, built as a project.

Tell us which engineers you need.

Stack, seniority, how many and when. We come back with matching profiles, availability and rates within three working days.

You interview them with your own process, and you reject anyone you are not sure about.

  • 1Send the requirements
  • 2Get profiles with CVs, availability and rates in 3 days
  • 3Interview, choose, and start within a week

We sign an NDA before discussing anything in detail. We reply within 24 hours.

Request profiles

Or book a call and skip the form.Your details are handled under our privacy policy.